From:TheBahamasWeekly.com
Dr. Nicolette Bethel on Bahamas Junkanoo Carnival
By Dr. Nicolette Bethel
May 15, 2015 - 10:51:54 AM
Bahamas Junkanoo Carnival is over, and it was a
rip-roaring success. As happened in Grand Bahama, in Nassau thousands and
thousands of people thronged the festival site, hungry for the
new experience, and for the first time ever The Bahamas entered the
twenty-first century world of festivals, productions and events.
For the
first time ever, too, the government of The Bahamas understood and supported
the need for real economic investment in bringing something like this off;
the committee that was appointed brought local financial and production
expertise to the table and ensured that the execution of the event would
be top-class; Bahamians and international performers were hosted on the same
stage and that stage was beamed to the world; and at long, long last the Fort
Charlotte/Arawak Cay arena has been turned into the kind of festival village
that has long been dreamed about.
Throughout the world, the twenty-first century has
brought with it a hunger for the festival experience, and, together with
tourism, the cultural economy is one of the fastest growing economic sectors in
the world. To say we have been slow to capitalize on that is to understate the
reality.There are many festivals throughout The Bahamas. They have been
happening for years, but none of them have been able to tap into the
global economy the way Junkanoo Carnival was able to for many reasons. They are
run like petty shops; they are overly politicized; they rely too much on
government handouts rather than focussing on economic generation; they are
poorly advertised; they are treated like backyard get-togethers rather than
businesses. This homecoming culture, as one might call it, has not taken
advantage of any of the things that the twenty-first century has to offer with
regard to linking culture and tourism and participating wholly in the global
cultural economy. Bahamas Junkanoo Carnival has changed that game entirely.
In the months leading up to this event, many people
asked me for my opinion of Junkanoo Carnival, and wondered if I would speak
publicly and critically about it. I did not. I didn't join the chorus of people
criticizing the concept for the simple reason that I fundamentally agree with
the need—economically and socially—to shift the government's focus and
investment from old, mid-twentieth century economic activity to the cultural
industries. I fought for an event like this when I served as Director of
Culture.The festival model that was put in place here is in many
ways a mirror image the festival model that was put forward by Keith Nurse in
2004 when he was engaged to lead a task force on the transformation of
CARIFESTA. It's something you will hear me talk about if you download and
listen to the podcasts on CARIFESTA, which were produced back in 2008 when we
were hosting and not-hosting the festival. Those of us who fought for the
inauguration of a festival culture in The Bahamas have all been
vindicated. I could not oppose what I fundamentally support.
But I have always resisted the linking of this
transition from homecoming culture to festival culture with the name and form
of Carnival.I have always believed, and continue to believe, that we
missed a major, major opportunity to put the whole of Bahamian culture squarely
on the world stage by choosing to make our mega-festival in the image of the
Trinidad carnival rather than studying the ways in which Carnival were
monetized and working out how we could do that with Junkanoo.
I am not convinced by many of the reasons spouted to
justify spending money to bring in Trinidadian consultants to produce a
cookie-cutter event. No one has yet explained to me to my satisfaction why
it was necessary to import a Trini-style Carnival (when we could have turned to
Brazil, whose Carnaval
is even bigger and more lucrative than Trinidad's, and whose production is far
closer than to what exists in Junkanoo today) rather than investing
in the time and energy required to make Junkanoo the centre of the experience.
Now I have worked with Junkanoo for almost all of my adult life, and I know as
well as anyone who has done so how unbelievably difficult it is to work with
the Junkanoo community; how obstructive that community can be; how unreasonably
protective they are of their vision of Junkanoo; how ignorant many of them
are of the history and significance of what they do; how petty their
differences; how slow they are to change. Any one of these arguments
would have brought agreement from me; but I still would have demanded that the
new festival at least
consider ways in
which our own aesthetic and traditions could be honoured, rather than
supplanted by those of another territory.But the ease with which our
leaders were able simply to import a ready-made festival was troubling, to say
the least.
The whole process
behind this festival
revealed, once again, how deeply people who sit in positions of authority in
our country distrust what is ours, how ready we are to push aside what is
vibrant and indigenous when it is unformed and messy in honour of what is
foreign and nicely packaged. What we did with the festival itself is akin to
what we do with our houses, our fruit, and, in general, our national
development. We build Florida boxes that hug the ground, have no cross-ventilation,
and which bake in the heat and flood in the rains, when we have a perfectly
good vernacular architecture that developed to handle our environment. We buy
mangoes and avocadoes and bananas and oranges with "Dole" and
"Sunkist" and other US stickers on them when the same fruit are
growing in our back yards and on our islands; and we have come to regard the
solution to all of our local issues as being the outsourcing the problem area
to the most convenient foreign direct investor.
Countries don't grow by outsourcing. Corporations may
do so, but citizens are not commodities. And cultural expressions are not
interchangeable. What is most troubling about the whole exercise is the
narrative that has emerged, that local expressions of culture
cannot be monetized, that
Junkanoo
cannot be
improved, that Junkanoo has "served its purpose" and needs to move
over to make room for Carnival. This discussion, this argument, which I have
seen flourish on Facebook in too many places to be believed, is part of the reason
I am weighing in on this now, after the fact.
Let me be quite clear here. I do not believe for one
moment that the reason this weekend was successful was because we were
celebrating Carnival and not Junkanoo. The greatest success took place at Da Cultural
Village. Even though many people took part in, and enjoyed, the Road Fever, the
real achievement lay in the hosting, the production, and the presentation of
the concerts on Fort Charlotte and Arawak Cay. The real value of the
mega-festival lay in the promotion of Bahamian music, and in the development of
our event management skills. It was connected also to the
recognition/admission/understanding, at long last, that we exist as part of a
wider pan-Caribbean world and that our music has a place alongside it on the
global stage. The success that was achieved lay in the marriage of industrial
standard production values—and international-style
expenditure to achieve
those values—rather than in any shift to the celebration of Carnival. Let us
keep that in mind as we carry this discussion forward.
But let me be equally clear. The most disturbing thing
that has come out of the weekend has been the fact that we have now set the
carnival in opposition to what is ours—and that to do so, we have spouted the
most arrant nonsense about carnival, Junkanoo, and what they mean to us. I have
seen people try to argue that Carnival and Junkanoo are basically the same
thing. I have seen people suggest that for us to move on
from Junkanoo
to Carnival is some sort of inevitable cultural evolution, in complete
ignorance of the cultural evolution that has got Junkanoo to where it is today.
Rather than incorporating the Carnival as a celebration of our Caribbean
connections, which we could have done to the same effect, we have set up an
opposition that pits Junkanoo against Carnival.
Finally, one last concern. Much has been made of the
fact that a study that I oversaw has found that Junkanoo does not turn a
profit. People who have never looked at that study, who have clearly never even
heard me explain what that study did and showed have been all over the airwaves
using that study to justify why we should invest in Carnival and not in
Junkanoo. We have bought into the idea that Carnival is an economic engine for
development and Junkanoo is a drain on the public purse. I will go into far
more detail about that study in a later post, but let me just say this:
Carnival could not have happened the way it did this year without the
participation of the Junkanoo community; their artistic and costuming expertise
was hard at work in many of the Carnival companies. Many designers and builders
participated in Carnival as a means of making money out of the event, as a
means of turning what they do every year for love and the nourishing of their
spirits into a means of making a living because they have not been afforded the
opportunity to make that living out of Junkanoo. Whether Carnival offered
them the economic returns that it
promised has yet to be determined. For me, the real value of this event will
lie in its ability not only to allow at long last the chance for musicians,
dancers and producers to make a living doing what they love, but also to
bolster the growth of Junkanoo, a festival that we Bahamians have already
developed. And that success still remains to be seen.
Nicolette Bethel
© Copyright 2015 by thebahamasweekly.com -